Why N100 Notes Is Being Left To Decay Into Extinction
The last
time the N100 note currently in circulationwas printed was in November, 2014. As such,
age has cut up with most of the notes in circulation; and some have even
succumbed to extinction, leaving it in short supply and impacting on the exchange
of goods and services.
The
special N100 bill was printed as part of events to mark Nigeria’s centennial
celebration at the time.
It was issued
not long after Mr. Godwin Emefiele, current Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
governor, was appointed to succeed MalamSanusiLamidoSanusi, who had been suspended
by former President Goodluck Jonathan for allegedly dabbling in opposition
politics at the time.
Given
that no law in Nigeria provides for certainty of tenure for circulating
currency, it is not uncommon to find Naira notes in degenerative states – threadbare,
decrepit and smelly due to over-use and over-circulation to the point of
national embarrassment.
The
situation of Nigeria’s latest N100 bill in this regard is particularly marked
that it comes across as though someone is taking out punitive measure against the poor N100 bill.
Most
N100 notes in circulation today are short of being totally in shreds,
practically diseased, and factually constituting health risks to Nigerians, not
a few of whom have even come down with an assortment of conditions for handling
the note.
Indeed,
the N100 note has become a national humiliation, yet the President Muhammadu
Buhari-led government doesn’t seem to blink, although a country’s currency not
only constitutes a statement of national pride, but also a symbol of national identify.
It goes
without saying that if Nigerians had a choice, they will not touch the bill
even with a long pole. They will avoid it like Ebola; and rather deal with the
other bills, since the CBN hasn’t ceased to print new notes of the others
unlike the fate that has befallen N100 notes.
However,
avoiding the use of the N100 bill is however impossible,because the various
denominations of the naira, being measures or store of relative value, play
their various roles in oiling the exchange and transactional mechanisms.
Once it
was when in the course of an exchange, a Nigerian could reject a N100 note either
as settlement for debt or as balance after settling debt, if he deemed the note
as scruffy or tattered.
But these
days Nigerians accept the notes no matter its presentation, quite under duress
and reminiscent of an oppressive condition.
They are
pressed to accept the note anyway, anyhow because, regardless, it remains a
store of value even if looking utterly messy.
To this
end, the question agitating many a Nigerian is: why has the CBN, as the agency
of government responsible for printing naira notes, failed to print new notes of
the N100 bill and also giving that scarcity of the note is hurting business
transaction in the country and despite the health risks which use of the grubby
notes pose to the average citizen;
One
commentator, while hazarding a poor explanation, said: “The current scarcity of
N100 could be tied to series of CBN policies, one of which is the cashless
policy that aims to reduce the amount of physical currency circulating in the
economy.
“The
scarcity may also be tied to the economics of Naira notes denominations. What
this implies is that the CBN may have deliberately reduced the quantity of N100
notes minted because of the associated cost of minting.
“It is
cost efficient for the CBN to print more of N500 and N1000 notes than to print
lots of N100 notes and other smaller denomination notes.”
Another
commentator, explaining:“The gist is that these banks are charged a fee by the
Central Bank anytime they take these mutilated notes to the CBN to be replaced.
And the banks would rather not pay that fee.
“Apart
from that, there is the issue of having to employ people to do the job of collecting
and sorting the bad notes for onward transmission.
“The
commercial banks would rather keep the money they would’ve had to pay the
people employed to do that job. Protecting the bottom line, profits, is the
important thing here.”
It would,
however , be recalled that no sooner had the CBN issued the new N100 bill into
circulation in 2014 than Muslim groups in country began to complain bitterly and
join issues against it
This
development did render the new note a subject of religious controversy.
For instance,
the Professor IshaqAkintola-led Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) noted:“The office
of the Muslim Rights Concern has been inundated with calls for action on the
Jewish symbol on the new note.
“Nigerian
Muslims are complaining that the Arabic writing in Hausa language (the Ajami
script) that read ‘Naira Dari’ (i.e. one hundred naira) on the N100 note has
been removed and replaced with the Jewish symbol, the Star of David.
“MURIC
recalls that Arabic inscriptions which have always been on Nigerian currency
since independence were unceremoniously removed in 2005 from N5, N10, N20 and
N50 denominations. They remained on N100, N200, N500 and N1,000 denominations.
“Nigerian
Muslims regard the latest action, namely, the supplanting of Arabic with Jewish
symbol from the new N100 as a continuation of the campaign of elimination by
substitution against Arabic language.”
But in a
swift reaction to Akintola allegation that the Jonathan government was
championing Zionism in Nigeria using the Naira, the government clarified that
“There is nowhere on that proposed note where there is any Jewish or Zionist
symbol or the Star of David.
“The
symbol that he is referring to is not a Jewish symbol. It is what they call
spark security feature. It is an optical magnetic feature which enables the
public to authenticate a currency note whether it is genuine or counterfeit.
That is the function of that particular design.”
Then, in
April, this year, MURIC returns pouring invectives on the N100 note. Akintola
called for its immediate withdrawal from circulation, but this time not over
Jewish symbol.
He said:
“The administration of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan officially issued the
N100 commemorative centenary banknote on 19th December 2014.
“A major
feature of that banknote was the removal of Arabic Ajami. Nigerians consider Jonathan’s N100 note
inferior to others printed earlier. It is of very low quality. It tears easily.
It lacks second-hand value. It grows soft and fragile with time, thereby making
it difficult to handle or fold in people’s pockets or wallets.
“Three
and a half years on, Jonathan’s N100 note has qualified for the worst banknote
ever printed in Nigeria. It is a national disgrace. This banknote should be
withdrawn from circulation.
“The
removal of Arabic Ajami is being interpreted as an attempt to discourage the
learning and use of Arabic language which is the language of the Glorious
Qur’an. It is a sensitive religious matter.”
If the foregoing
is anything to go by, it would then be safe to say that the N100 note is
suffering because it offended Muslim sensibilities.
Hence,
nobody should expect new notes of the bill to be printed in the foreseeable
future in order to have run into natural extinction.
It
appears the note is being deliberately left to decay so that Akintola’sand his
ilk would be justified in giving it a bad name in order to for Nigerians to
demand for its replacement by a new bill that will satisfy Muslim standards.
Post a Comment